MOST COMMON REASONS FOR PRAGMATIC INCOMPETENCE OF LEARNERS

Authors

  • Malika Mukhitdinovna Narzullayeva Academic Lyceum of Westminster International University in Tashkent

Keywords:

pragma-linguistic competence, socio-pragmatic competence, learner resistance, stressful experience, language aspect.

Abstract

This thesis examines the concept of “pragmatic competence” and its importance in both learning and teaching English as a foreign language. Moreover, the work details two of the five common and frequent causes of students’ pragmatic incompetence. In a global world, knowledge of cultural norms and knowledge of the pragmatic features of the target language are key factors for successful language integration. Ignorance of pragmatics can lead to culture shock, demotivation, and miscommunication between native speakers and international language learners.

References

Brock, M. N., & Nagasaka, Y. (2005). Teaching pragmatics in the EFL classroom? SURE you can! TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27-41.

Davletnazarova, L. B. (2021). Causes of pragmatic failure and ways to avert them in teaching english language. International journal of discourse on innovation, integration and education, 2(2), 53-56.

Gomez-Laich, Maria Pia. (2016). Second language learners’ divergence from target language pragmatic norms. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.

Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289-310.

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-10

How to Cite

Narzullayeva, M. M. (2022). MOST COMMON REASONS FOR PRAGMATIC INCOMPETENCE OF LEARNERS. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE DEDICATED TO THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1(9), 17–20. Retrieved from https://openidea.uz/index.php/conf/article/view/317